Converting Blender Filmic LUTs for use in Substance Painter

with the new Filmic Blender color management options getting a lot of attention I wanted to get the exact same looks when creating textures in Substance Painter.
Substance Painter supports LUTs in so called 3d format which are stored in .exr files. So our challenge is twofold: convert the bundled Blender Filmic LUTs to this format and of course to get results in Substance that match Blender as closely as possible.
The results of 3 of the filmic LUTs are compared side by side in the image below:

I made this comparison collage by keeping parameters like exposure (1) and gamma (also 1) the same in both Blender and Substance Painter and then took screenshots. I glued the screenshots together in GIMP. This way I could see all images on the same monitor. This is important because if the applied profiles are the same and both displays are sRGB, two monitors will still differ in their color response and it is fiendishly difficult to calibrate them (unless you have a very expensive monitor with the associated color calibration kit). My own monitors are not even the same brand so it is an easy trap to fall into if you compare images on two different monitors side by side.
Anyway, even this way when you have a close look the images are close in tone but not 100% identical and I am not sure what is causing this. There might be slight differences in camera aperture, focal blur and multiple importance sampling of the environment and of course Cycles' ray model is not the same as Iray's Substance painting mode renderer. Still, I think this is pretty close and useful to compare textures in Substance under different looks before transferring them to Blender.

How the LUTs were generated

I used the Python bindings of the OpenColorIO and OpenImageIO libraries to create a small script (code below). These are in fact the libraries Blender uses to work with color conversions.

The script takes a linear to linear transform that is encoded as an .exr image and creates a new .exr for each 'Look' in Blender's OCIO config file that is defined in the 'Filmic Log' process space.
The docs for the Python bindings for both libraries are not an easy read and the APIs have some small inconsistencies so it took some time to get it working. The code is far from beautiful but i commented the relevant parts. I am open to any critique that can help to improve the transforms.
Note that the code is not plug and play and i have no intention of improving that :-)

The Substance LUTs

They can be downloaded from my GitHub repository. They are bundled in one .zip file and should be unpacked before importing them in Substance Painter.

The code

#export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/michel/ocio/lib
#export OCIO=/home/michel/Downloads/blender-2.78-b94a433ca34-linux-glibc219-x86_64/2.78/datafiles/colormanagement/config.ocio
#python 2.7
# run as
# python
# expects linear_to_linear.exr in the current directory and will write the transform there too

import OpenImageIO as OIIO  #  already installed using Ubuntu pkg manager
from sys import path
from array import array
import PyOpenColorIO as OCIO

config = OCIO.GetCurrentConfig()

for look in config.getLooks():
 if look.getProcessSpace() == 'Filmic Log':
  lookname = look.getName()

  transform = OCIO.DisplayTransform()
  processor = config.getProcessor(transform)

  # indentiy transform from
  img ='linear_to_linear.exr')
  spec = img.spec()
  spec.set_format(OIIO.FLOAT) # for some reason this is not extracted from the image
  pixels = img.read_image()

  outfile = lookname + '.exr'
  transformedpixels = processor.applyRGB(pixels)
  imgout = OIIO.ImageOutput.create(outfile), spec, OIIO.Create)
  if not ok:
  # ImageInput.read_image() returns a list of floats, and applyRGB(0 returns one too, but ImgOutput.write_image
  # expects an array of float and will die when passed a list. Bit inconsistent I think.
  a = array('d')


  1. Could you publish these in the .cube format so i can use them in other software aswell?

    1. I would like to but as far as I can tell there is no support for .cube in the oiio libraries, sorry.

  2. Really nice Michel, I'm currently looking for a AcesCG for Painter 2018. We can read some proposal on some forum around spring 2017 where "they will integrate in a close future the AcesCG LUT to painter"... Not yet done apparently. I'll check your GitHub if I can give it a try (not a programmer I am). Cheers!